Grid & solar
Import, generation, demand, and source timestamps where feeds are available.
The platform
See the operation behind the energy.
Enervtek’s product direction connects available plant signals, adds production context, and gives engineers a traceable path from a change to an action.
Inputs & context
A site model built from accessible records.
A pilot starts with what the site can provide. Integration depth and data quality determine which views are useful.
Equipment & events
Meter readings, selected PLC or inverter events, and stoppage history where integrations permit.
Production context
Good output, shifts, product or batch records, and quality caveats for meaningful comparisons.
Capability map
What the product is being built to answer.
Stages describe the current product direction; they are not claims of deployment at a customer site.
Unified energy sources
“How much came from grid and solar, and when?”
Bring accessible import and generation feeds onto one timeline with clear units, source labels, and data gaps.
Pilot integration targetEquipment & zone visibility
“Which instrumented area changed?”
Move from site to area, line, and machine where metering coverage supports it. See the mapping before drawing conclusions.
Pilot integration targetEnergy vs production
“Did energy rise because output rose?”
Compare kWh with accepted output, shift, and product context when reliable production records are available.
High-priority pilot hypothesisDeviation & event timeline
“When did a change begin?”
Review baseline deviations beside imported events, stoppages, and engineer annotations.
MVP directionDemand & indicative cost
“What could consumption or demand mean for cost?”
Explore forecasts and tariff-aware estimates with visible assumptions and uncertainty. Billing accuracy depends on verified tariff logic.
Planned / validation neededEvidence-led insights
“What should an engineer check?”
Present possible causes, supporting signals, and suggested investigation steps for human review.
Future / experimentalExample workflow
Follow the evidence, then the outcome.
An illustrative spinning-line investigation shows how the screens could support a plant team. No site measurements are represented.
See the pilot process- NoticeEnergy per good kg differs from the selected baseline.
- CompareCheck same-shift output, product, and quality records.
- InvestigateReview source readings, meter coverage, and inverter or stoppage events.
- DecideDiscuss possible causes with maintenance and record the agreed action.
- MeasureCompare later shifts and preserve the caveats in a report.
Designed for trust
Show the limits alongside the numbers.
Metrics should identify their feed, time range, timestamp, and data gaps.
Energy per unit appears only when the output denominator is trustworthy.
Suggestions remain hypotheses until the plant team confirms what happened.
Platform FAQ
Built around site reality.
Will every system connect automatically?
No. Feeds, formats, access, and permissions are reviewed with each site before a pilot is scoped.
Can it calculate exact energy cost?
Only when meter boundaries, tariff rules, taxes, and allocation logic are known and validated. Early estimates are marked indicative.
Does it control equipment?
No. The proposed workflow supports investigation and human decisions; it is not an electrical protection or autonomous control system.
Start a conversation
Discuss a pilotBring your plant’s energy and production story together.
Start with one site, one question, and a measurable outcome.